CRISPR and crispier
CRISPR or ‘Clustered regularly-interspaced short
palindromic repeats’ is a genetic engineering feat that has been borrowed/learned
from bacteria that have been using the technique to defend themselves against
viral infections for hundreds of millions of years. Yep, even E. coli can catch
a cold and don’t like it. Viruses that attack bacteria are called bacteriophage
or simply phages
Anyway, CRISPR is one method to alter or edit a strand of DNA. The majority of the thousands of bacterial
species in existence have developed this defense mechanism. Clever eh? An aside
here: the fact that ALL living creatures on this planet – viruses and bacteria
included, along with plants and us animals, all use the same code system for
their genetic material - is huge
evidence that we are all from a single point of creation close to 4 billion
years ago, and are therefore all
related to one other.
Now it has been suggested that the CRISPR technique of genetic
engineering be used to cripple the DNA of Aedes
aegypti the species of mosquito that
carries the Zika virus, plus the dengue and chikungunya viruses, thus wiping
out this species of mosquito which threatens the lives of hundreds of thousands
of people in the coming years, spreading up into the United States further and
further north as climate change continues to bring warmer and wetter weather.
BUT, already the alarm bells are being sounded – ooh we mustn’t harm this
cute little mosquito. OK not quite in those terms. But let’s get things in
perspective. We’re happy to kill viruses and bacteria and wish we could totally
eradicate those that cause TB and the plague etc. But then there are other
bacteria such as E. coli that we depend on for our digestion, and can’t live
without. Another aside: I get irritated when the evening news talks of an
outbreak of E. coli – heh, I have a billion inside of me – I hope. What they
mean is a rogue strain of E. coli with some altered DNA; but let’s not get
sidetracked.
OK you say, it’s fine to kill viruses and bacteria but a mosquito is an
animal. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
over three thousand species of animals
are in the process of being obliterated, mainly through human action, and few
people care a ---- . Among these are the Siberian tiger, the Brown spider
monkey (a fairly close relative of mine) and the blue-throated Macaw – a beautiful
bird; all more closely related to me than a mosquito. OK: yes, we should
ascertain the biological linkages of the Aedes mosquito: is it an important
food source for some other creature? does it play a part in some pollination? Etc.
etc. But what should not be dismissed, before any research has been done, is to
even look at this possible avenue of removing this serious threat to human
life.
I live in the Boston area and our regional newspaper The Boston Globe really has had its knickers in a twist over
gene-editing in recent days with several articles critical of the process. Apparently
the idea behind it comes from the billionaire owner of the newspaper. The
article today is classic - reporting on a phone survey. It begins: “Most
Americans oppose using powerful new technology (note the phraseology) to alter
the genes of unborn babies, even to prevent serious inherited diseases,
according to a new poll.” I’m not at all surprised. The USA is the only western
nation where the majority of the population is so poorly educated, at least in
the life sciences, that they don’t even accept the truth of evolution – a fact
that has been known for many decades and is accepted in the rest of the
developed world. Americans hear the term
DNA used in crime dramas on TV all the time but the vast majority won’t know
what the letters stand for let alone how DNA operates in our bodies. So if
asked over the phone if they want DNA manipulated in a lab, and using creepy CRISPR
too, of course they’re going to flip and say NO.
I’m a proud member of the National Committee for Science Education NCSE.
We are working to try and ensure that public school students are taught the wonderful
truths of the life sciences, which in too many states they are not. 23% of biology teachers in public schools
refuse to teach evolution. Without that basic concept one cannot understand how
this wonderful and complex world of nature works and interacts. We should
support the important research being done to understand gene editing, CRISPR included, and how
we can use this knowledge to save human lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment